Nighthawk
11.08.2010, 13:41:33
For fight one:
Helicopter tilt is a minor piece of eye candy, yes. However, that's all it is. There's little I can say to argue for or against it, it's not something I'm likely to make a lot of use of.
That said, the second issue seems like a subset of the already-assigned slave logic improvements, and I see it getting much less usage than helicopter tilt, regardless of how much more complex this issue is.
I've little to say on either issue, neither is something I'm utterly enthusiastic about, but for the sake of argument I may as well say support #741, kill #1009.
For fight two:
Hmm, two art-related issues. Again, not my main area of expertise. The first issue's title nearly threw me until I read the feature request. The title makes it sound like it's requesting that turrets can be composed of multiple voxels, but it actually means multiple voxel-based turrets on a unit. Outside of a restoration of the RA1 Cruiser and a mod using these irritatingly popular 'epic units', how often would this be used? Of course, personally I wouldn't mind something like this. It would mean I could put a secondary AA weapon on some tank units without them looking silly by rotating the main turret to fire the AA gun.
As for the second one, again, a badly named feature request. At first I thought it was something to do with climbing infantry, but evidently not. It's about the ability for SHP vehicles to have slope-specific frames. Now, compared to the previous issue, not a lot of mods use SHP vehicles (those that do are brilliant at it, of course), and I could see most everyday modders getting more use out of the first issue than this one. So while me saying this does feel like I'm potentially crippling the likes of Reign of the Steel, the first issue does have more appeal to me.
Therefore, my stance is support #510, kill #488.
Helicopter tilt is a minor piece of eye candy, yes. However, that's all it is. There's little I can say to argue for or against it, it's not something I'm likely to make a lot of use of.
That said, the second issue seems like a subset of the already-assigned slave logic improvements, and I see it getting much less usage than helicopter tilt, regardless of how much more complex this issue is.
I've little to say on either issue, neither is something I'm utterly enthusiastic about, but for the sake of argument I may as well say support #741, kill #1009.
For fight two:
Hmm, two art-related issues. Again, not my main area of expertise. The first issue's title nearly threw me until I read the feature request. The title makes it sound like it's requesting that turrets can be composed of multiple voxels, but it actually means multiple voxel-based turrets on a unit. Outside of a restoration of the RA1 Cruiser and a mod using these irritatingly popular 'epic units', how often would this be used? Of course, personally I wouldn't mind something like this. It would mean I could put a secondary AA weapon on some tank units without them looking silly by rotating the main turret to fire the AA gun.
As for the second one, again, a badly named feature request. At first I thought it was something to do with climbing infantry, but evidently not. It's about the ability for SHP vehicles to have slope-specific frames. Now, compared to the previous issue, not a lot of mods use SHP vehicles (those that do are brilliant at it, of course), and I could see most everyday modders getting more use out of the first issue than this one. So while me saying this does feel like I'm potentially crippling the likes of Reign of the Steel, the first issue does have more appeal to me.
Therefore, my stance is support #510, kill #488.
Ares Project Manager.
![[Image: t3wbanner.png]](http://thirdwar.cncguild.net/images/t3wbanner.png)
![[Image: cncgsigsb_sml.png]](http://nighthawk.cncguild.net/things/cncgsigsb_sml.png)
Open Ares positions: Documentation Maintainer, Active Testers.
PM if interested.
Open Ares positions: Documentation Maintainer, Active Testers.
PM if interested.