Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD-R3: 957 vs. 292, 556 vs. 976
#13
While deformable terrain is neat, I agree with what has been said. It wasn't any fun.

But to the grass logic I put what about the TS arctic theater, wouldn't the snow be turned into water vapor on impact an explosive artillery shell?

I would kind of like ranged drain weapons, like a magnetron that drains energy and money. Why else have a backwards wave for buildings? I don't see much use in reload rates, you can balance power with ammo and the plane's strength, cost, and speed.
[Image: darkstormsmall.png]


Messages In This Thread
DFD-R3: 957 vs. 292, 556 vs. 976 - by Renegade - 11.08.2010, 01:37:50
RE: DFD-R3: 957 vs. 292, 556 vs. 976 - by eva-251 - 11.08.2010, 02:24:15
RE: DFD-R3: 957 vs. 292, 556 vs. 976 - by eva-251 - 11.08.2010, 08:32:05
RE: DFD-R3: 957 vs. 292, 556 vs. 976 - by Blade - 11.08.2010, 12:46:40
RE: DFD-R3: 957 vs. 292, 556 vs. 976 - by mt. - 11.08.2010, 18:26:42
RE: DFD-R3: 957 vs. 292, 556 vs. 976 - by MRMIdAS - 11.08.2010, 20:19:14
RE: DFD-R3: 957 vs. 292, 556 vs. 976 - by Beowulf - 11.08.2010, 22:23:37
RE: DFD-R3: 957 vs. 292, 556 vs. 976 - by Darkstorm - 12.08.2010, 07:06:01
RE: DFD-R3: 957 vs. 292, 556 vs. 976 - by Beowulf - 13.08.2010, 01:13:05
RE: DFD-R3: 957 vs. 292, 556 vs. 976 - by AlexB - 02.10.2010, 23:55:58
RE: DFD-R3: 957 vs. 292, 556 vs. 976 - by DCoder - 03.10.2010, 20:37:17



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)