Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD: 668 vs. 948, 729 vs. 978
#6
(23.07.2010, 02:06:49)Beowulf Wrote: Not a fan of #978. #729 gets my vote. There are some very interesting ideas present in RA3 that would work EQUALLY well in YR. Surely some of them would have easy implementation. The amount of things that could be done with the logic from RA3 is amazing, but it doesn't have just emulate RA3 precisely. The ideas are what counts and silly is what reigns in RA2 and RA3.

While I am not a fan of the MC priorities either, the RA3 thing is a meta feature request with several seperate features that should all have been submitted seperately to survive or die on their own merits, some of which can already be done. IMO it should loose by default and seperate requests for the stuff that can't be done submitted with MC Priorities going through to at least the next round where it hopefully faces defeat against something more deserving.


Messages In This Thread
DFD: 668 vs. 948, 729 vs. 978 - by Renegade - 22.07.2010, 20:27:02
RE: DFD: 668 vs. 948, 729 vs. 978 - by Beowulf - 23.07.2010, 02:06:49
RE: DFD: 668 vs. 948, 729 vs. 978 - by Blade - 23.07.2010, 12:50:54
RE: DFD: 668 vs. 948, 729 vs. 978 - by Renegade - 23.07.2010, 02:35:11
RE: DFD: 668 vs. 948, 729 vs. 978 - by MRMIdAS - 23.07.2010, 20:57:41
RE: DFD: 668 vs. 948, 729 vs. 978 - by Nighthawk - 24.07.2010, 02:29:51
RE: DFD: 668 vs. 948, 729 vs. 978 - by AlphaBravo - 26.07.2010, 01:52:36
RE: DFD: 668 vs. 948, 729 vs. 978 - by Renegade - 28.07.2010, 23:23:02
RE: DFD: 668 vs. 948, 729 vs. 978 - by Renegade - 06.08.2010, 03:25:56
RE: DFD: 668 vs. 948, 729 vs. 978 - by AlexB - 06.08.2010, 05:59:03
RE: DFD: 668 vs. 948, 729 vs. 978 - by Renegade - 06.08.2010, 07:01:14



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)