Blade
21.07.2010, 10:18:18
Kill #332 There are plenty of ways to make more superweapons, deal with it. How exactly will there be one icon for a superweapon building? Isn't that the same as the clutter for superweapons themselves or do you mean building type? If thats the case, how do you know which "copy" is ready to fire and how much the others have to charge in RA2's limited UI? I support #991 because more generals style logic is a bad thing and we need less of it.
Sorry if this comes across as a bit immature Beowulf, but your "argument" for supporting #991 comes across as "I want RA2 to be more like generals, waa waa" rather than any particular discussion on the merits of the features. Tibtrees making different types of ore/tiberium is IMO a restored TS feature and has a lot of support from people wanting to make TS based mods.
For the second fight, I don't really find either feature that compelling. Shp units already have limited ability to define animation sequences ala the cyborg reaper in TS but then again I don't think units who's primary weapon runs out after a while sounds all that great either.
Sorry if this comes across as a bit immature Beowulf, but your "argument" for supporting #991 comes across as "I want RA2 to be more like generals, waa waa" rather than any particular discussion on the merits of the features. Tibtrees making different types of ore/tiberium is IMO a restored TS feature and has a lot of support from people wanting to make TS based mods.
For the second fight, I don't really find either feature that compelling. Shp units already have limited ability to define animation sequences ala the cyborg reaper in TS but then again I don't think units who's primary weapon runs out after a while sounds all that great either.