Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD: 914 vs. 392, 283 vs. 602
#8
Honestly, I've never noticed any lag whilst playing with cloak generators, even when I cloaked half a map at one point I noticed no slowdown. I mean, on old computers obviously. I once tried to run it on a computer so slow I could train 5 G.Is before the barracks built up and that didn't work, but since I got a newer computer I haven't had any problems at all (newer = Windows 98 FYI). And with this current computer, nadda, not a thing. So what is this "Epic lag" everyone keeps refering to and is it at all gamebreaking??


Messages In This Thread
DFD: 914 vs. 392, 283 vs. 602 - by AlexB - 17.07.2010, 19:04:28
RE: DFD: 914 vs. 392, 283 vs. 602 - by MRMIdAS - 17.07.2010, 22:01:23
RE: DFD: 914 vs. 392, 283 vs. 602 - by reaperrr - 17.07.2010, 22:25:51
RE: DFD: 914 vs. 392, 283 vs. 602 - by Beowulf - 17.07.2010, 23:39:13
RE: DFD: 914 vs. 392, 283 vs. 602 - by Darkstorm - 18.07.2010, 00:47:03
RE: DFD: 914 vs. 392, 283 vs. 602 - by Black Shadow 750 - 18.07.2010, 02:17:50
RE: DFD: 914 vs. 392, 283 vs. 602 - by reaperrr - 18.07.2010, 02:57:04
RE: DFD: 914 vs. 392, 283 vs. 602 - by WoRmINaToR - 18.07.2010, 22:34:56
RE: DFD: 914 vs. 392, 283 vs. 602 - by reaperrr - 18.07.2010, 23:47:42
RE: DFD: 914 vs. 392, 283 vs. 602 - by WoRmINaToR - 19.07.2010, 17:23:49
RE: DFD: 914 vs. 392, 283 vs. 602 - by WoRmINaToR - 19.07.2010, 18:46:24
RE: DFD: 914 vs. 392, 283 vs. 602 - by WoRmINaToR - 19.07.2010, 20:00:40
RE: DFD: 914 vs. 392, 283 vs. 602 - by AlexB - 22.07.2010, 06:43:53
RE: DFD: 914 vs. 392, 283 vs. 602 - by DCoder - 22.07.2010, 11:02:25
RE: DFD: 914 vs. 392, 283 vs. 602 - by Renegade - 22.07.2010, 22:41:45
RE: DFD: 914 vs. 392, 283 vs. 602 - by DCoder - 26.07.2010, 20:34:31
RE: DFD: 914 vs. 392, 283 vs. 602 - by Renegade - 27.07.2010, 02:38:06



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)