Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD: 914 vs. 392, 283 vs. 602
#6
Kill #914. It feels like another, more complicated 'warhead' system. I don't really see the point to it. Mix it with the Random Damage request and the traditional warhead system and you're pretty much there. As said, kill #914.

I support #392 in that is proposes a new idea. I like the idea of forcing certain things for various weapons. It's a good idea.

For the second one, I really don't care which one wins so I abstain my vote on it.
I'm what Willis was talkin' about.


Messages In This Thread
DFD: 914 vs. 392, 283 vs. 602 - by AlexB - 17.07.2010, 19:04:28
RE: DFD: 914 vs. 392, 283 vs. 602 - by MRMIdAS - 17.07.2010, 22:01:23
RE: DFD: 914 vs. 392, 283 vs. 602 - by reaperrr - 17.07.2010, 22:25:51
RE: DFD: 914 vs. 392, 283 vs. 602 - by Beowulf - 17.07.2010, 23:39:13
RE: DFD: 914 vs. 392, 283 vs. 602 - by Darkstorm - 18.07.2010, 00:47:03
RE: DFD: 914 vs. 392, 283 vs. 602 - by reaperrr - 18.07.2010, 02:57:04
RE: DFD: 914 vs. 392, 283 vs. 602 - by WoRmINaToR - 18.07.2010, 22:34:56
RE: DFD: 914 vs. 392, 283 vs. 602 - by reaperrr - 18.07.2010, 23:47:42
RE: DFD: 914 vs. 392, 283 vs. 602 - by WoRmINaToR - 19.07.2010, 17:23:49
RE: DFD: 914 vs. 392, 283 vs. 602 - by WoRmINaToR - 19.07.2010, 18:46:24
RE: DFD: 914 vs. 392, 283 vs. 602 - by WoRmINaToR - 19.07.2010, 20:00:40
RE: DFD: 914 vs. 392, 283 vs. 602 - by AlexB - 22.07.2010, 06:43:53
RE: DFD: 914 vs. 392, 283 vs. 602 - by DCoder - 22.07.2010, 11:02:25
RE: DFD: 914 vs. 392, 283 vs. 602 - by Renegade - 22.07.2010, 22:41:45
RE: DFD: 914 vs. 392, 283 vs. 602 - by DCoder - 26.07.2010, 20:34:31
RE: DFD: 914 vs. 392, 283 vs. 602 - by Renegade - 27.07.2010, 02:38:06



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)