Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD: 372 vs. 333, 586 vs. 324
#4
Even though the author wants [0000372] euthanised, it gets my vote, purely upon the fact it doesn't involve (what seems to me as) tibsun bug replication fuckery.

[0000586] gets my vote, purely because [0000324] makes little sense, why not just have the unit the previous one morphs into available to that country? (i get a horrible feeling I requested that too, major brainfart on my part if so)
[Image: MRMIdAS2k.jpg]
MRMIdAS: No longer allowed to criticise Westwood on PPM


Messages In This Thread
DFD: 372 vs. 333, 586 vs. 324 - by AlexB - 17.07.2010, 16:11:35
RE: DFD: 372 vs. 333, 586 vs. 324 - by Striker - 17.07.2010, 16:46:04
RE: DFD: 372 vs. 333, 586 vs. 324 - by Blade - 17.07.2010, 18:06:27
RE: DFD: 372 vs. 333, 586 vs. 324 - by MRMIdAS - 17.07.2010, 18:11:14
RE: DFD: 372 vs. 333, 586 vs. 324 - by Beowulf - 17.07.2010, 23:34:26
RE: DFD: 372 vs. 333, 586 vs. 324 - by Darkstorm - 18.07.2010, 00:32:21
RE: DFD: 372 vs. 333, 586 vs. 324 - by Renegade - 18.07.2010, 22:24:16
RE: DFD: 372 vs. 333, 586 vs. 324 - by AlexB - 18.07.2010, 23:37:53
RE: DFD: 372 vs. 333, 586 vs. 324 - by Renegade - 27.07.2010, 03:00:25



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)