Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD: 681 vs. 757, 358 vs. 526
#3
keep

[0000757],deployed armour (or damage on the weapons) has been done, but allowing a unit to selfheal when deployed would be pretty cool, or even, as people have requested, give it RA3 style extras.

[0000358] larger vehicles would prevent graphical overlap, help with targeting larger vehicles in a sea of overlapped large vehicles, and could possibly (and rightfully) be affected more by cellspread weapons, depending on how big they are.
[Image: MRMIdAS2k.jpg]
MRMIdAS: No longer allowed to criticise Westwood on PPM


Messages In This Thread
DFD: 681 vs. 757, 358 vs. 526 - by Renegade - 05.07.2010, 21:21:50
RE: DFD: 681 vs. 757, 358 vs. 526 - by MRMIdAS - 05.07.2010, 23:24:41
RE: DFD: 681 vs. 757, 358 vs. 526 - by cranium - 06.07.2010, 01:10:29
RE: DFD: 681 vs. 757, 358 vs. 526 - by jimmy3421 - 06.07.2010, 05:13:03
RE: DFD: 681 vs. 757, 358 vs. 526 - by Beowulf - 06.07.2010, 05:32:55
RE: DFD: 681 vs. 757, 358 vs. 526 - by Blade - 06.07.2010, 10:45:25
RE: DFD: 681 vs. 757, 358 vs. 526 - by reaperrr - 06.07.2010, 19:19:09
RE: DFD: 681 vs. 757, 358 vs. 526 - by reaperrr - 07.07.2010, 00:57:38
RE: DFD: 681 vs. 757, 358 vs. 526 - by AlexB - 07.07.2010, 19:34:21
RE: DFD: 681 vs. 757, 358 vs. 526 - by Renegade - 07.07.2010, 20:21:51
RE: DFD: 681 vs. 757, 358 vs. 526 - by DCoder - 08.07.2010, 18:37:12
RE: DFD: 681 vs. 757, 358 vs. 526 - by Renegade - 08.07.2010, 19:15:00



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)