Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD: 749 vs. 378, 1009 vs. 446
#13
So instead of random damage (which could be really useful, especially for stuff like D-Day - Tank shells failing to penetrate -, balancing snipers - a chance to 'miss' their targets, reduction of the mathematical nature of combat - grizzly kills rhino in X shots, rhino kills grizzly in y shots, I need blah ratio to win) you gys would prefer simultaneous firing of burst= shots? Something that will have a few cosmetic uses and possibly slightly maybe kinda help railguns?


Messages In This Thread
DFD: 749 vs. 378, 1009 vs. 446 - by Renegade - 01.07.2010, 16:25:59
RE: DFD: 749 vs. 378, 1009 vs. 446 - by MRMIdAS - 01.07.2010, 17:17:09
RE: DFD: 749 vs. 378, 1009 vs. 446 - by Firefly - 01.07.2010, 18:28:56
RE: DFD: 749 vs. 378, 1009 vs. 446 - by jimmy3421 - 01.07.2010, 18:54:51
RE: DFD: 749 vs. 378, 1009 vs. 446 - by FS-21 - 01.07.2010, 19:31:24
RE: DFD: 749 vs. 378, 1009 vs. 446 - by reaperrr - 01.07.2010, 22:30:10
RE: DFD: 749 vs. 378, 1009 vs. 446 - by Orac - 01.07.2010, 22:00:42
RE: DFD: 749 vs. 378, 1009 vs. 446 - by MRMIdAS - 01.07.2010, 22:32:53
RE: DFD: 749 vs. 378, 1009 vs. 446 - by Marshall - 01.07.2010, 22:47:15
RE: DFD: 749 vs. 378, 1009 vs. 446 - by reaperrr - 01.07.2010, 23:48:32
RE: DFD: 749 vs. 378, 1009 vs. 446 - by Lt Albrecht - 03.07.2010, 15:29:01
RE: DFD: 749 vs. 378, 1009 vs. 446 - by MRMIdAS - 03.07.2010, 17:33:30
RE: DFD: 749 vs. 378, 1009 vs. 446 - by Renegade - 03.07.2010, 18:48:29
RE: DFD: 749 vs. 378, 1009 vs. 446 - by AlexB - 03.07.2010, 18:51:27
RE: DFD: 749 vs. 378, 1009 vs. 446 - by DCoder - 03.07.2010, 19:10:38
RE: DFD: 749 vs. 378, 1009 vs. 446 - by Renegade - 03.07.2010, 20:02:00



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)