Marshall
14.10.2006, 15:09:48
Launch Base implications for RockPatch:
If you don't know about Launch Base, see this thread
"Version" is shown to the users. It can be any string.
"Build" is the internal version number used by the author (pd/CnCVK). It can be any integer.
This may not be orthodox to some, but Version and Build are the same thing, just from different perspectives.
Build number is used internally for prerequisite and update checks.
Launch Base will have a Check For Updates facility that will allow the Rock Patch to be updated with just a few clicks.
I am hoping that with the advent of Launch Base, the stand-alone installer for the Rock Patch will be abolished. Until then, the existing method will suffice.
If you don't know about Launch Base, see this thread
"Version" is shown to the users. It can be any string.
"Build" is the internal version number used by the author (pd/CnCVK). It can be any integer.
This may not be orthodox to some, but Version and Build are the same thing, just from different perspectives.
Build number is used internally for prerequisite and update checks.
Launch Base will have a Check For Updates facility that will allow the Rock Patch to be updated with just a few clicks.
I am hoping that with the advent of Launch Base, the stand-alone installer for the Rock Patch will be abolished. Until then, the existing method will suffice.
Ever wondered what the hell is going on?
Believe me friend you're not the only one.
--Lysdexia
Check out Launch Base for RA2/YR - http://marshall.strategy-x.com
Also home to the Purple Alert mod, 1.002 UMP, and the YR Playlist Manager.
Believe me friend you're not the only one.
--Lysdexia
Check out Launch Base for RA2/YR - http://marshall.strategy-x.com
Also home to the Purple Alert mod, 1.002 UMP, and the YR Playlist Manager.