Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD-R3: 932 vs. 732, 991 vs. 283
#8
Support #732. But for a different reason honestly - the AI. This will benefit the AI more than players really. Presumably, it would allow the AI to easily handle multiple loaded transport scripts, saving AI scripters like me heavy amounts of headaches trying in vain to make this work. Seems like a very worthy feature indeed.

Support #991. The request is a lot more straightforward than #283 and it would seem to benefit a few more people. Besides, if the documented limits on upgrades were lifted, it would make #283 redundant to be rather honest. Let's see some new ore and tiberium tree types!
I'm what Willis was talkin' about.


Messages In This Thread
DFD-R3: 932 vs. 732, 991 vs. 283 - by Renegade - 11.08.2010, 01:50:01
RE: DFD-R3: 932 vs. 732, 991 vs. 283 - by mt. - 11.08.2010, 03:37:56
RE: DFD-R3: 932 vs. 732, 991 vs. 283 - by Blade - 11.08.2010, 11:52:56
RE: DFD-R3: 932 vs. 732, 991 vs. 283 - by MRMIdAS - 11.08.2010, 20:42:40
RE: DFD-R3: 932 vs. 732, 991 vs. 283 - by Beowulf - 11.08.2010, 23:03:47
RE: DFD-R3: 932 vs. 732, 991 vs. 283 - by AlexB - 21.08.2010, 09:22:56
RE: DFD-R3: 932 vs. 732, 991 vs. 283 - by DCoder - 03.10.2010, 20:37:24



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)