Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD-R3: 715 vs. 725, 757 vs. 607
#5
Fight 1 I agree with the posters so far

Fight 2 I say prioritise the restoration of an old feature that has high demand rather than a new feature of unproven desirability and that could be accomplished in a much better way by deploys into logic. There are many modders doing RA1 or TS mods that would benefit from the storage restoration. I've seen lots of feature subset requests for Spawns and Deploys logics during the DFD and I think really they should just all have been rolled into two large feature issues and confirmed for implementation given the diffuse but large support all the subsets seem to have had. Would have simplified the DFD a large amount too.


Messages In This Thread
DFD-R3: 715 vs. 725, 757 vs. 607 - by Renegade - 11.08.2010, 01:41:24
RE: DFD-R3: 715 vs. 725, 757 vs. 607 - by Orac - 11.08.2010, 05:41:22
RE: DFD-R3: 715 vs. 725, 757 vs. 607 - by Blade - 11.08.2010, 12:36:04
RE: DFD-R3: 715 vs. 725, 757 vs. 607 - by eva-251 - 11.08.2010, 19:02:44
RE: DFD-R3: 715 vs. 725, 757 vs. 607 - by MRMIdAS - 11.08.2010, 20:15:31
RE: DFD-R3: 715 vs. 725, 757 vs. 607 - by Beowulf - 11.08.2010, 22:19:07
RE: DFD-R3: 715 vs. 725, 757 vs. 607 - by AlexB - 18.09.2010, 17:38:45



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)