Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD-R3: 957 vs. 292, 556 vs. 976
#17
The point is that aircraft can't be extended beyond one ammo with high damage or multiple shots with low damage, or beyond using heavy cost to determine strength with the global reload time. With aircraft-specific reload times, you can then add pad helicopters reminiscent of the Hind/Apache in Red Alert that reload exceptionally since they fire multiple bursts and then have traditional aircraft like the Harrier and Black Eagle that fire one very powerful shot but have a longer reload time to prevent their abuse.

The global reload time severely limits the potential application for AircraftTypes. Cost, strength, speed, weapon damage and warhead tweaking only go so far and it's not nearly far enough.
I'm what Willis was talkin' about.


Messages In This Thread
DFD-R3: 957 vs. 292, 556 vs. 976 - by Renegade - 11.08.2010, 01:37:50
RE: DFD-R3: 957 vs. 292, 556 vs. 976 - by eva-251 - 11.08.2010, 02:24:15
RE: DFD-R3: 957 vs. 292, 556 vs. 976 - by eva-251 - 11.08.2010, 08:32:05
RE: DFD-R3: 957 vs. 292, 556 vs. 976 - by Blade - 11.08.2010, 12:46:40
RE: DFD-R3: 957 vs. 292, 556 vs. 976 - by mt. - 11.08.2010, 18:26:42
RE: DFD-R3: 957 vs. 292, 556 vs. 976 - by MRMIdAS - 11.08.2010, 20:19:14
RE: DFD-R3: 957 vs. 292, 556 vs. 976 - by Beowulf - 11.08.2010, 22:23:37
RE: DFD-R3: 957 vs. 292, 556 vs. 976 - by Beowulf - 13.08.2010, 01:13:05
RE: DFD-R3: 957 vs. 292, 556 vs. 976 - by AlexB - 02.10.2010, 23:55:58
RE: DFD-R3: 957 vs. 292, 556 vs. 976 - by DCoder - 03.10.2010, 20:37:17



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)