Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD-R2: 1149 vs. 1114, 1072 vs. 1047
#2
I go with [0001114] on the basis that if [0001149] wants what I think (a RA1 style, animated miner, using the scoop when it collects etc), that's either a lot of Voxel/HVA buggery, or an SHP miner, IF the miner is SHP, then it'd need a sequence on a vehicle, and an extra "mining" entry to go with it. too much work IMO.

[0001047] Gattling Logic needs to be unit dependant, with fallback to default values should new ones not be found, Gattling tank parsed first, then if theres no value set, the first lot of gattling values in the Rulesmd.
[Image: MRMIdAS2k.jpg]
MRMIdAS: No longer allowed to criticise Westwood on PPM


Messages In This Thread
RE: DFD-R2: 1149 vs. 1114, 1072 vs. 1047 - by MRMIdAS - 29.07.2010, 00:44:29



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)