Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD: 326 vs. 1042, 444 vs. 612
#7
Fight #1
Kill 326: Way too limited in usefulness.
Support 1042: While I see this being difficult to implement, it offers much more in the long run than 326.

Fight #2
Kill 444: MT echos my sentiments. While the workaround isn't perfect, it should do the job well enough.
Support 612: The reason why RA2/YR simply cannot be challenging without ridiculous cheating (gigantic economic advantage, multi-factories, etc) is the lack of these improvements. The AI hits a defensive position and lets a single Prism Tower or Tesla Coil zap the attackers one by one. A mixed Prism/Mirage force gets demolished by a single Apoc. The list goes on and on.

Bettering YR's AI is a must- we should not have to depend entirely on making it get 65,000 from a single Chrono Miner dump or building 5 Grizzlies at once for it be a challenge.
Star Strike Next Beta :V.7x -- (current version=V.6x Build 2)
Star Strike TC Forums
Star Strike Website


Messages In This Thread
DFD: 326 vs. 1042, 444 vs. 612 - by Renegade - 22.07.2010, 20:29:09
RE: DFD: 326 vs. 942, 444 vs. 612 - by reaperrr - 23.07.2010, 00:53:06
RE: DFD: 326 vs. 942, 444 vs. 612 - by Beowulf - 23.07.2010, 01:09:33
RE: DFD: 326 vs. 1042, 444 vs. 612 - by Renegade - 23.07.2010, 02:31:40
RE: DFD: 326 vs. 1042, 444 vs. 612 - by mt. - 23.07.2010, 03:34:24
RE: DFD: 326 vs. 1042, 444 vs. 612 - by eva-251 - 23.07.2010, 06:00:01
RE: DFD: 326 vs. 1042, 444 vs. 612 - by Blade - 23.07.2010, 13:08:07
RE: DFD: 326 vs. 1042, 444 vs. 612 - by MRMIdAS - 23.07.2010, 20:50:48
RE: DFD: 326 vs. 1042, 444 vs. 612 - by Nighthawk - 24.07.2010, 02:01:37
RE: DFD: 326 vs. 1042, 444 vs. 612 - by Renegade - 28.07.2010, 23:21:34
RE: DFD: 326 vs. 1042, 444 vs. 612 - by Renegade - 06.08.2010, 05:00:59
RE: DFD: 326 vs. 1042, 444 vs. 612 - by AlexB - 07.08.2010, 04:48:10
RE: DFD: 326 vs. 1042, 444 vs. 612 - by Renegade - 07.08.2010, 06:40:59



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)