Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212
#7
I don't really recall forest fires logic being all that great even in TS although of course it did actually work there. Then again I do normally support restored TS logics. That said, I think the units requiring power to be used is an interesting concept that one might base an entire faction around, with underpowered units that don't require power, but overpowered units that do but are vunerable to sneak attacks on the base with disks or spy units.

For the second fight I don't think the custom infiltration logic as proposed is all that compelling and it would be nice to see the AI be slightly more intelligent. On the other hand however, the AI is never going to be fantastic, so throwing too much at it to improve it is to the detriment of other features that might add more to the game for more people.


Messages In This Thread
DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by AlexB - 20.07.2010, 06:24:20
RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by jimmy3421 - 20.07.2010, 06:43:03
RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by Blade - 20.07.2010, 15:34:17
RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by MRMIdAS - 20.07.2010, 16:46:22
RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by Darkstorm - 20.07.2010, 20:07:38
RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by Blade - 20.07.2010, 23:19:33
RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by Beowulf - 21.07.2010, 07:54:52
RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by Darkstorm - 21.07.2010, 09:44:45
RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by Striker - 21.07.2010, 13:33:32
RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by Renegade - 23.07.2010, 02:11:07
RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by AlexB - 07.08.2010, 19:18:45
RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by Renegade - 08.08.2010, 07:58:14



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)