Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD: 708 vs. 404, 334 vs. 947
#2
Fight 1:
Can anyone guarantee that Quad-Threading would really improve performance significantly? If not, then it's too much of a "shot in the dark" to be worth pursuing. The lag under Vista/7 is annoying, but unless there's a guarantee that this would fix it, I say kill #708, support #404, since #404 would actually useful for things like Firestorm-style mobile war factories.

Fight 2: Uh, isn't #947 already implemented in the betas and just needs some testing (and potential bug-fixing)?
Anyway, #947 isn't important to me (and may be of little use without a map editor that supports this), so I say support #334, because that could actually be useful. I'm not sure if a Multiplier under [General] is the best solution, but basically it would be nice to have let's say a normal Orca with 6 missiles that is upgraded to 8 when it becomes Elite.


Messages In This Thread
DFD: 708 vs. 404, 334 vs. 947 - by Renegade - 14.07.2010, 18:53:00
RE: DFD: 708 vs. 404, 334 vs. 947 - by reaperrr - 14.07.2010, 19:34:07
RE: DFD: 708 vs. 404, 334 vs. 947 - by Beowulf - 14.07.2010, 20:58:37
RE: DFD: 708 vs. 404, 334 vs. 947 - by MRMIdAS - 14.07.2010, 22:14:39
RE: DFD: 708 vs. 404, 334 vs. 947 - by Darkstorm - 14.07.2010, 23:54:21
RE: DFD: 708 vs. 404, 334 vs. 947 - by FS-21 - 15.07.2010, 00:12:05
RE: DFD: 708 vs. 404, 334 vs. 947 - by Blade - 15.07.2010, 00:31:43
RE: DFD: 708 vs. 404, 334 vs. 947 - by AlexB - 16.07.2010, 19:53:03
RE: DFD: 708 vs. 404, 334 vs. 947 - by Renegade - 18.07.2010, 20:16:02
RE: DFD: 708 vs. 404, 334 vs. 947 - by Renegade - 18.07.2010, 20:31:10



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)