+- Renegade Projects Network Forums (https://forums.renegadeprojects.com)
+-- Forum: Inject the Battlefield (https://forums.renegadeprojects.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=60)
+--- Forum: News from the Battlefield (https://forums.renegadeprojects.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=20)
+--- Thread: Damn again, RPCE #0051 released. (/showthread.php?tid=731)
Damn again, RPCE #0051 released. - VK - 08.04.2007
Rock Patch Celebration Edition #0051
As always, after releasing RPCE, someone find a error.
With Nuke SW again; NukeTakeOff don't work at all.
then I found another bug:
if you or AI launched Nuke missile and you exit the game,
you can have a IE during load screen. Â
Fortunately, I didn't start coding RP 1.10 yet
So I fix this error.
Download here:
http://files.renegadeprojects.com/Rock%20The%20Battlefield/RockPatch_CE_0051.exe
RE: Damn again, RPCE #0051 released. - Guest - 09.04.2007
Well, atleast you fixed it. I hadn't even noticed this bug. Hmm. Good luck with 1.10 anyways.
RE: Damn again, RPCE #0051 released. - Guest - 12.04.2007
hopefully, you will see the reasonableness of what everyone is saying, and revert to the old (better) numbering scheme. It's kind of annoying to everybody when you come up with a number scheme that newcomers might not understand, and then use excuses like "I am the current developer of the patch, so I get to do what I like."
RE: Damn again, RPCE #0051 released. - VK - 13.04.2007
Quote:hopefully, you will see the reasonableness of what everyone is saying, and revert to the old (better) numbering scheme. It's kind of annoying to everybody when you come up with a number scheme that newcomers might not understand, and then use excuses like "I am the current developer of the patch, so I get to do what I like."No. I already done this, I like this and I won't change it.
If you don't like it, use RP 1.08 SE
RE: Damn again, RPCE #0051 released. - Nighthawk - 13.04.2007
Quote:No. I already done this, I like this and I won't change it.That's the problem, you like it, the majority of us don't. It's like taking a mod which had a good name, then calling it something like Namby Pamby Attack of the Pink Pretty Fairies.
RE: Damn again, RPCE #0051 released. - VK - 13.04.2007
Quote:That's the problem, you like it, the majority of us don't.Sorry, but this isn't interesting me at all
I am really working on it, spend a lot of time,
and I WILL select name, which I want, not you want, because this is my terrible work.
BTW, I don't ask why you called your mod "...", not Mod 723
RE: Damn again, RPCE #0051 released. - Renegade - 13.04.2007
What you don't seem to get is that there's a functional difference between an name and a version number. If you asked me "Why do you name your mod '...' and not 'Mod723'?", I could just say "because it's my mod and I like 'Mod723' better!". That's a perfectly reasonable answer. Obscuring the version "numbers", on the other hand, is not reasonable, at all. There is a big difference between insisting on naming your "own" project, and insisting to be the only programming project on the entire planet that had several major releases without an increase of the version number.
Even fucking Windows XP got "SP2" when they reached gold with it.
But noooo, Mr. VK insists on 1.08, 1.08++, no version, no version, 1.10. If you want to give it wacky names, fine. So be it. Know that the entire community hates it, but do what you have to do. But give them fucking consecutive version numbers.
On the same note, I'll compile a dictionary right now, mapping RockPatch releases to arbitrary numbers. If you don't want to decide which version something is, I'll do it. If you release version numbers, fine. If you don't, I'll just pick one. At least people will know what's current then.
RE: Damn again, RPCE #0051 released. - Bobingabout - 13.04.2007
rockpatch=modname
RPCE=version NUMBER!
eg
R:ROTC 0.4.2.0.7r1
Whiteboy rules v1.5
and so on
what sort of number is "Celebration Edition"?
RE: Damn again, RPCE #0051 released. - DCoder - 13.04.2007
What sort of number is "XP" or "Vista"? Leave VK alone, he's obviously just reusing the best ideas Microsoft had. </sarcasm>
Yes, I know XP does have an internal version number, 6.* .
Besides, you've been trying to reason with him for how long now? A month, two, six? It just won't work. Save your energy.
RE: Damn again, RPCE #0051 released. - Renegade - 14.04.2007
Done.
RE: Damn again, RPCE #0051 released. - VK - 14.04.2007
Quote:Yes, I know XP does have an internal version number, 6.* .
noWindows XP Pro & Home- Windows NT 5.1.
Windows XP x64 - Windows NT 5.2.
Windowws Vista - Windows NT 6.0.
Quote: It just won't work. Save your energy.I already said that this thing I won't change.
RE: Damn again, RPCE #0051 released. - DCoder - 14.04.2007
Yes, I know. Call it brain fart.
RE: Damn again, RPCE #0051 released. - VK - 16.04.2007
How this should be:
Part from RP 1.10 Help.
RE: Damn again, RPCE #0051 released. - Bobingabout - 16.04.2007
ZOMFG, firefox opened that in internet explorer!