Rock Patch Celebration Edition #0051
As always, after releasing RPCE, someone find a error.
With Nuke SW again; NukeTakeOff don't work at all.
then I found another bug:
if you or AI launched Nuke missile and you exit the game,
you can have a IE during load screen. Â
hopefully, you will see the reasonableness of what everyone is saying, and revert to the old (better) numbering scheme. It's kind of annoying to everybody when you come up with a number scheme that newcomers might not understand, and then use excuses like "I am the current developer of the patch, so I get to do what I like."
Quote:hopefully, you will see the reasonableness of what everyone is saying, and revert to the old (better) numbering scheme. It's kind of annoying to everybody when you come up with a number scheme that newcomers might not understand, and then use excuses like "I am the current developer of the patch, so I get to do what I like."
No. I already done this, I like this and I won't change it.
If you don't like it, use RP 1.08 SE
Quote:No. I already done this, I like this and I won't change it.
That's the problem, you like it, the majority of us don't. It's like taking a mod which had a good name, then calling it something like Namby Pamby Attack of the Pink Pretty Fairies.
Ares Project Manager.
Open Ares positions: Documentation Maintainer, Active Testers.
PM if interested.
Quote:That's the problem, you like it, the majority of us don't.
Sorry, but this isn't interesting me at all
I am really working on it, spend a lot of time,
and I WILL select name, which I want, not you want, because this is my terrible work.
BTW, I don't ask why you called your mod "...", not Mod 723
What you don't seem to get is that there's a functional difference between an name and a version number. If you asked me "Why do you name your mod '...' and not 'Mod723'?", I could just say "because it's my mod and I like 'Mod723' better!". That's a perfectly reasonable answer. Obscuring the version "numbers", on the other hand, is not reasonable, at all. There is a big difference between insisting on naming your "own" project, and insisting to be the only programming project on the entire planet that had several major releases without an increase of the version number.
Even fucking Windows XP got "SP2" when they reached gold with it.
But noooo, Mr. VK insists on 1.08, 1.08++, no version, no version, 1.10. If you want to give it wacky names, fine. So be it. Know that the entire community hates it, but do what you have to do. But give them fucking consecutive version numbers.
On the same note, I'll compile a dictionary right now, mapping RockPatch releases to arbitrary numbers. If you don't want to decide which version something is, I'll do it. If you release version numbers, fine. If you don't, I'll just pick one. At least people will know what's current then.
What sort of number is "XP" or "Vista"? Leave VK alone, he's obviously just reusing the best ideas Microsoft had. </sarcasm> Yes, I know XP does have an internal version number, 6.* .
Besides, you've been trying to reason with him for how long now? A month, two, six? It just won't work. Save your energy.
VK
Nighthawk
![[Image: t3wbanner.png]](http://thirdwar.cncguild.net/images/t3wbanner.png)
![[Image: cncgsigsb_sml.png]](http://nighthawk.cncguild.net/things/cncgsigsb_sml.png)
Renegade
Bobingabout
![[Image: bobbanner.gif]](http://bobingabout.gamemod.net/bobstempstuff/bobbanner.gif)
